
Monumental Building
Reviewed by: Em from Bath, Avon, GBR on Jul 13, 2007

Expensive, nasty waste of time
I went up the Rockefeller Center first. It was great, the most fun I've had in New York. Breathtaking. Then I went up the Empire State Building. It needs a new name, something that accurately reflects its status as an interminable collection of queues. The inside of the building is absolutely dire and unfinished; windows covered in brown paper, bare lightbulbs hanging from twists of wire, exposed pipes and crumbling concrete. They claim to be refurbishing it (of course, they don't tell you in advance that the place is currently a building site) but frankly given the cost I'm not inclined to make that many allowances - and a friend of mine who visited several years ago tells me that it was that way then, too. I wouldn't know what the view was like. They allow so many people up to the observation deck at any one time that the place is heaving - there's an average of three people between you and any kind of view. From what little I actually managed to see, I don't see that it's any better than the view from the Rockefeller center. The best thing about the building was the simulated helicopter tour of NYC, which was in any case something I paid extra to see. In short, people, the only good thing about this experience is that you can now tell people you've been up the Empire State Building. It's not worth it.
Would you recommend this to a friend?
No
Why? / Why Not?
Unfinished, interminably long queues, expensive - extortionately so. It's a waste of time.

LIGHTS should ALWAYS be RED WHITE AND BLUE
The lighting of the building for such events as celebrating 60 years of communism is an event that s...
Reviewed by:A Yahoo! Contributor from on Sep 30 2009




Which Extras To Pay For and Which To Skip
* My husband and I both loved the view from the 86th floor. You can see so much from the top of the ...
Reviewed by:Marcia from on Sep 22 2009